Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Sandro's avatar

Hi Jurgen! I happened to find this article just after reading about 22 AI-era tricky questions, and it kinda clicked with some questions I've thought of but left me with some more.

While this one roadmap is def a must for Solo Chiefs, it also seems to guide (as for me) greater businesses about Sustainability (1) and AI-David (2) (and Middle Management (3), a bit) points.

1. Kill/Simplify: accounting for climate (and financial, which is usually a higher priority to capitalistic entities) cost of implementing AI might help decide whether a task should be automated or left to humans. Like... why develop a power-hungry single-task machine only to follow the trend, or, more often, why add AI layer where common computers work just fine with a dash of cognitive human load? It might sound old-fashioned, but do we as humanity need a hundred of corporate TikTok editing AI tools instead of using that energy for developing reliable healthcare instruments?

2. Same goes for hierarchical established companies vs 3 humans in AI trenchcoat. If, of that 200 (000) employees entity, only three of them do decide how the work's done and what the brand brings for the table, they'd better rule the robots. Here the answer seems clear to me (thanks to your yet another brilliant article about PVMVP): the companies could use the diversity and personal approaches of their plenty workers to improve compared to smaller-capacity organizations or solopreneurs. Make the most of their humans, so to say jokingly. Meanwhile, for now it's small groups and individuals who make the most change for diversity and inclusion, as it seems to me (and as all my respect goes to them, I suppose corps could do better as well).

3. Which brings us here: from what I can grasp, the main value of managers in AI-era might no longer be executing tasks, but rather developing, testing and monitoring this 5-step process for various business implementations. While they not necessarily all have to requalify as AI prompting experts, their experience and agility seem to become of greater importance for discriminating essential from "bells&whistling", simplifying while accessing value, and overall adding common human sense to AI literal techno-brains. Source: my two jobs where managers are so busy cherry-picking individual tasks that I'm desperately in need (and somehow becoming, in my junior position) of someone to actually manage whole processes, settle guidelines and defining priorities. AI can handle the checklists, but it can't decide what and why we're actually doing.

Kinda sorry for the longread, and I do suppose some of those thoughts are actually common knowledge. Still, I'd love to discuss this point of view of mine or maybe learn what to read from you or others on this topic. Thanks a lot for the delicacies for though!

No posts

Ready for more?